Legal Opinion
MORALES v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 7, 2022No. 1:21-cv-11961Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NATASHA MORALES, No. 1:21-cv-11961-NLH-AMD Plaintiff, OPINION v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN, et al. Defendants. APPEARANCES: PETER M. KOBER 1864 RTE 70 EAST CHERRY HILL, NJ 08003 On behalf of Plaintiff JOHN T. STINSON, JR DOJ-USAO 401 MARKET STREET, 4TH FLOOR CAMDEN, NJ 08101 On behalf of the Marshal Defendants Hillman, District Judge This matter comes before the Court on the motion for judgment on the pleadings by Mark Kemner, Vincent Schmidt, Michael Biazzo, Stephen Bezich, Joseph Goonan, and Baruch Zepeda (the “Marshal Defendants”). (ECF 27). Also…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.