Legal Opinion

Primary Consultants, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County Recorder

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 12, 2005No. 1 CA-CV 04-0268PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALL, Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiff-appellant Primary Consultants, L.L.C., a political consulting firm, and its managing member Paul Ulan (collectively, Primary Consultants) appeal from the trial court’s decision denying special action relief and concluding that defendants-appellees Maricopa County Recorder Helen Purcell and Maricopa County Director of Elections Karen Osborne (collectively, the County), acting in their official capacities, did not improperly deny it access to certain voter information. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court’s ruling and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Carlson v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. West Valley View, Inc. v. Maricopa County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Democratic Party of Pima County v. Beth Ford Pima County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Valerie M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Lake v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. LaWall v. R.R. Robertson, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API