Legal Opinion

Jesse v. Giguiere

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1937No. Civ. 10388PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSttjrtevant, J.

From a judgment rendered against him for damages for injuries sustained in an automobile collision the defendant has appealed.

He contends that the judgment is without support in the evidence for the reason that the evidence will not support a finding that any negligence of defendant proximately caused or contributed to plaintiffs ’ injuries. The accident occurred on the afternoon of the 9th day of June, 1935, in the city of Burlingame. Burlingame Avenue runs east and west. On the north side is a polo field. • From the south Channing Road runs north to Burlingame Avenue opposite the polo…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crabbe v. RhoadesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Lindenbaum v. BarbourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Graham v. Consolidated Motor Transport Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Morrow v. MendlesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wells v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kalfus v. FrazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. George v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Jorgensen v. East Bay Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Lopez v. WislerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API