Legal Opinion

Northwestern Packing Co. v. Whitney

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1907No. Civ. No. 173PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.

The complaint alleges that in October, 1902, plaintiff sold and delivered to defendants two hundred and fifty barrels of red Alaska Salt Salmon at $7.50 per barrel, less a discount of five per cent, making the total amount due $1,781.25; that the same had not been paid, except the sum of $850 on account, leaving $931.25 due and unpaid. The answer denies specifically the allegations of the com plaint, and by way of counterclaim alleges that the plaintiff is indebted to the defendants in the sum of $1,593.75 for work and labor performed by defendants for plaintiff at its special instance and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Gashwiler v. WillisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Alta Silver Mining Co. v. Alta Placer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Fontana v. Pacific Can Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Bliss v. Kaweah Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Black v. Harrison Home Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Total Coverage, Inc. v. Cendant Settlement Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. International Magazine Co. v. National Radio Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Kitzmiller v. Pacific Coast & Norway Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Deovletian v. WhitneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API