Legal Opinion

Kitzmiller v. Pacific Coast & Norway Packing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1916No. 13043PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered April 27, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action to recover a broker’s commission, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Respondents sued and recovered upon a broker’s commission for services performed in selling 10,000 cases of canned salmon, upon a contract made with defendant corporation through its general manager, Joseph Kildall. The salmon was never delivered. Appellants’ claims of error are grounded upon two general propositions, viz.: (1) Kildall had no express or implied authority; (2) the contract was unusual in its terms and without precedent. The arguments are elaborate, but the facts are plain and the issues are simple.

The Pacific Coast & Norway Packing Company, for several years prior to January,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Carney v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Camacho v. Hamilton Bank Note & Engraving Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Hyde v. LarkinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Brace v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Edwards v. Plains Light & Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1914

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Wick Building Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Smith v. Hansen, Hansen & Johnson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. Peninsular Savings & Loan Ass'n v. C. J. Breier Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Betz v. Tacoma Drug Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. A. J. Anderson Co. v. Citizens' Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API