Legal Opinion

In re Roundup Prods. Liab. Litig.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 10, 2018No. MDL No. 2741; Case No. 16-md-02741-VCPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge

The question at this early phase in the proceedings-the "general causation" phase-is whether a reasonable jury could conclude that glyphosate, a commonly used herbicide, can cause Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma ("NHL") at exposure levels people realistically may have experienced. If the answer is yes, the case moves to the next phase, which addresses whether each particular plaintiff's NHL was caused by glyphosate. If the answer is no, none of the plaintiffs' cases may proceed. And the answer must be no unless the plaintiffs can present at least one…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Edwin Hardeman v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Conservation Council for Hawaii and American Bird Conservancy v. Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc., et al.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2026
  3. Feindt v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2024
  4. In Re Pacific Fertility Center LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  5. In Re Zantac (Ranitidine) LitigationSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API