Legal Opinion
In Re Zantac (Ranitidine) Litigation
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided May 31, 2024No. N22C-09-101 ZANPublished
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) IN RE ZANTAC (RANITIDINE) ) LITIGATION ) ) ) C.A. NO. N22C-09-101 ZAN ) ) Submitted: March 7, 2024 Decided: May 31, 2024 Corrected: June 3, 2024 OMNIBUS ORDER ON MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT OPINIONS I. INTRODUCTION Nearly 75,000 Plaintiffs seek to be heard in Delaware for claims alleging that their cancer was caused due to the ingestion of a heartburn medication commonly known as Zantac. In this early stage of these proceedings, before the Court for disposition are the parties’ competing motions to exclude expert testimony pursuant to Rule 702 of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re: Tmi Litigation Lori Dolan Joseph Gaughan Ronald Ward Estate of Pearl Hickernell Kenneth Putt Estate of Ethelda Hilt Paula Obercash Jolene Peterson Estate of Gary Villella Estate of Leo Beam, No. 96-7623 in Re: Tmi Litigation All Except Lori Dolan, Joseph Gaughan, Ronald Ward, Estate of Pearl Hickernell, Kenneth Putt, Estate of Ethelda Hilt, Paula Obercash, Jolene Peterson, Estate of Gary Villella and Estate of Leo Beam, No. 96-7624 in Re: Tmi LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Geraldine McCULLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. H.B. FULLER COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- M.G. Bancorporation, Inc. v. Le BeauSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.