Legal Opinion

Folsom v. Peru Plow & Implement Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1903No. 12,888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the district court for Saunders county: Benjamin F. Good, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Albert, C.

In March, 1900, one Adam Berkheámer executed an instrument, which the parties hereto have seen fit to treat as a chattel mortgage on certain farming implements, to secure a bona, fide indebtedness; the mortgagor retained possession of the property. In November of the same year the mortgagor died, and on the 5th day of the following December C. N. Folsom was appointed administrator of the estate, and,' as such administrator, took possession of the mortgaged property. The mortgage was not filed for record until the 29th day of March, 1901, after the administrator had taken possession…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kilbourne v. FayOhio Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Ohm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. James Forrester & Co. v. Kearney National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Field v. AndradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. O'Connor v. BoylanMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blackman v. Baxter, Reed & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Wasatch Livestock Loan Co. v. NielsonUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Burke v. FredericksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Wasatch Livestock Loan Co. v. NielsonUtah Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API