Legal Opinion

James Forrester & Co. v. Kearney National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1896No. 6700PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court of Buffalo county. Heard below before Holcomb, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNor val, J.

The record discloses that on the 4th day of June, 1890, one F. M. Harter, being indebted to the Kearney National Bank, executed to it a chattel mortgage on his stock' of merchandise to secure the payment of said indebtedness. The mortgage was filed for record on the 5th day of July, 1890, and Harter’s debt being unpaid, on the same day the bank took possession of the property under the mortgage. Two days later James Forrester & Co. commenced an action against said Harter for the recovery of the sum of $1,839.88 and caused an attachment to be issued and levied upon the property mentioned in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cameron, Hull & Co. v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Frank v. MinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  3. State ex rel. Durkheimer v. GraceOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Charles Root & Co. v. HarlMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Nash v. NormentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re Antigo Screen Door Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
  2. In re Great Western Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. In re Pekin Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  4. In re ShirleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  5. Todd v. County of Box ButteNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API