Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Boylan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1882PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Kent. Administrator’s bill to compel payment of full value of land fraudulently conveyed by decedent. Complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, O. J.

For many years prior to January 31st, 1880, Lawrence Boylan the decedent owned and resided on ,a parcel of land containing about five acres in the township •of "Wyoming in Kent county. It was worth five or six hun•dred dollars.

His wife died in May, 1879, but he continued his residence on the premises until his own death, which occurred April 20, 1880. He had no children. From his wife’s death until a few weeks before his own one Mary Mullen ikept his house and rendered him valuable service. He had no property except this small place and about $135 of personalty. Mrs. Mullen had a…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ohm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Johnson v. RutherfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Field v. AndradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Buckley v. MaupinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. Ombrello v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API