State v. Kalk
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
¶1. David Kalk argues that his criminal convictions should be reversed because of a conflict of interest on the part of the prosecuting attorney who had previously represented Kalk in an unrelated 1987 criminal proceeding. We reject Kalk's argument because he has failed to show any actual conflict of interest or prejudice. We affirm the judgment and order.
Facts
¶ 2. Robert Wells, Jr. is the current district attorney for Sheboygan county. In 1987, Wells, then a public defender, represented Kalk on charges of disorderly conduct, battery, criminal damage to property, endangering safety by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scheunemann v. City of West BendCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- State v. KayeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- State v. MedranoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gatewood v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- State v. TkaczCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Guerrero v. CaveyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
- State v. MedinaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006