Legal Opinion

State v. Tkacz

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 16, 2002No. 02-0192-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶ 1. In this case, the prosecuting attorney previously represented Peter G. Tkacz in a civil forfeiture action before joining the district attorney's office. Tkacz sought to remove the prosecutor prior to trial claiming a conflict of interest. As did the trial court, we adopt the "substantial relationship" test when the issue is raised pretrial during criminal cases. Because the prior civil action and this criminal action were not substantially related, we affirm the trial court's denial of Tkacz's motion. We also address and reject Tkacz's two other issues: that Tkacz's trial counsel was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. DemmerlyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  3. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  4. State v. Gonzalez-VillarrealCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
  5. State v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API