Legal Opinion

J & J Construction Co. v. Mayernik

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is an action to recover damages for breach of a written contract. Plaintiff had judgment in a trial by jury and defendant has appealed. The judgment was for $935, in accordance with a provision of the contract calling for liquidated damages. ①

Three assignments of error raise the single question whether the court erred in refusing to submit to the jury evidence that the parties orally agreed that the writing was not to become effective as a contract until approved by the defendant’s wife, Lucy Mayernik.

The contract, which is on a printed form, is for the remodeling of the kitchen in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hanrahan-Wilcox Corp. v. Jenison MacHinery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Dorsey Et Ux. v. Tisby Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Fadex Foreign Trading Corp. v. Crown Steel Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Mapes v. Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Travers-Newton Chautauqua System v. NaabSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Wittick v. MilesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Luther Williams, Jr., Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. FMA Financial Corp. v. Hansen Dairy, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Aetna Insurance Company v. NewtonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API