Legal Opinion

United States v. Bennett

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 28, 2000No. Nos. 97-50605, 98-50002, 98-50070, 98-50209, 98-50212, 98-50514PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated appeals of defendants/appellants Daniel Ray Bennett, Edward Stanley, Victor Murillo, Rim Harris, Monica Renee Gant, and Richard Washington involve convictions resulting from an investigation of Stanley’s drug organization, headquartered in Los Angeles, California. Bennett and Stanley entered conditional guilty pleas to conspiracy to commit interstate murder-for-hire resulting in death, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1958. Murillo and Harris entered conditional guilty pleas to possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. Ralph Chavous Duke, Also Known as Plookie, Also Known as PlukeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. CraigheadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API