State v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the municipal court of Minneapolis, W. A. Kerr, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The defendant was charged in the municipal court of Minneapolis with violating an ordinance of the city in failing to close and keep closed his saloon on Sunday. (£he complaint also alleged a former conviction of a similar violation of the same ordinance. He was found guilty, and sentenced to pay a fine, and it was further ordered and adjudged that his license to sell intoxicating liquors be revoked and canceled. We think the evidence was sufficient to justify the court in finding the defendant guilty of the violation of the ordinance charged, and also that it conclusively established his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. St. Paul Gaslight Co. v. McCardySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Crookston v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Jackson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Phelps v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- State v. BoehmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- State Ex Rel. Stanchfield v. SalisburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.