Jackson v. Board of Education
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Submission of a controversy to the 'district court for Hennepin county upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to E. L. 1905, § 4286. The services mentioned in the opinion were rendered in a suit by Mae Snow against defendant board of education and five of its members. The other facts are stated in the opinion. The matter was heard by Hale, J., who found that plaintiff was not entitled to recover $650 or any other sum, and ordered judgment in favor of defendant.
Read the full summary
Submission of a controversy to the 'district court for Hennepin county upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to E. L. 1905, § 4286. The services mentioned in the opinion were rendered in a suit by Mae Snow against defendant board of education and five of its members. The other facts are stated in the opinion. The matter was heard by Hale, J., who found that plaintiff was not entitled to recover $650 or any other sum, and ordered judgment in favor of defendant. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
This controversy was submitted to the district court without pleadings upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 4286, R. L. 1905. Plaintiff was, with the approval of the city attorney of Minneapolis, employed by defendant as an attorney, and rendered to defendant legal services of the. value of $650. The board of education of the city of Minneapolis was organized under chapter 157, p. 144, Sp. Laws 1878, and constitutes and is the public *168school authority of the municipality of the city of Minneapolis. The agreed statement of facts contained this:
“The said parties also agree that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Whitney Arms Co. v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Chapman v. County of DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- State v. CassidySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- City of Winona v. School-District, No. 82Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Borough of Henderson v. County of SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith ex rel. Smith v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Laird Norton Yards v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Board of Education v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Gordon v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Minneapolis, St. Paul, Rochester & Dubuque Electric Traction Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.