Legal Opinion

City of Crookston v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 26, 1900No. Nos. 12,142-(52)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Polk county, Watts, J., overruling a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINS, J.1

This is an action to recover the amount of certain interest and penalties alleged to have been collected by the county treasurer on account of taxes which have been levied for city purposes on property within the limits of plaintiff city for a series of years prior to and including 1899, and also interest which the county has received, it is claimed, on account of the amount so collected, from county depositaries. The right of the city to recover is predicated upon an act of the legislature entitled “An act to amend and consolidate the charter of the city of Crookston,” now found…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Putnam v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  2. Jones v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. State v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  5. In Re MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API