Legal Opinion

Sisco v. Rotenberg

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 9, 1958PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

104 So.2d 365 (1958)

Beatrice Maud SISCO, Appellant,

v.

Leo ROTENBERG, Appellee

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 9, 1958.

Willes & Bittan, Fort Pierce, and Messer & Willis, Tallahassee, for appellant.

T.B. Ellis, Jr., Fort Pierce, Charles B. Adams, West Palm Beach, and Leonard Pepper, Tallahassee, for appellee.

O'CONNELL, Justice.

The principal question involved in this appeal as stated by appellant is as follows:

"When a lease of realty for a specified term of five years also provides that the lessor agrees `during the tenure of the lease' to sell to the lessee the leased property for a named cash price…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kreiss Potassium Phosphate Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  2. Shouse v. DoaneSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  3. Pettit v. TourisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Walker v. CloseSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  5. Sanford v. CloudSupreme Court of Florida · 1880

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. CU Associates, Inc. v. RB Grove, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Thomas & Son Tr. Line, Inc. v. Kenyon, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Walker v. State, Dept. of Transp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Doolittle v. Fruehauf CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Koplin v. BennettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API