Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Earley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1955No. 89PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Tbe defendants during tbe pendency of tbe action filed three Answers. They assign as error No. One, Judge Clarkson, upon motion of tbe plaintiff, “striking out parts of defendant’s answer.” However, they bring forward and discuss in their brief only tbe striking out of all allegations to tbe effect that H. R. Green could not execute a valid assignment of tbe lease and option to tbe plaintiff, because at tbe time of its execution and delivery be was mentally incompetent. After Judge Clarkson’s order, tbe defendants filed a second Answer making substantially tbe same allegations. Judge Moore,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chaffin v. BrameSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Matter of HoldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Monger v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Speed v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. FrazelleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Lieb v. MayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Rhodes v. RaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Crisp v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Chesson v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API