Legal Opinion

Casstevens v. Wagoner

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1990No. 8923SC1280PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

A single issue, which we raise ex mero motu, is dispositive of this appeal, namely, whether the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over this action. We determine that it did not, and we therefore vacate the judgment entered.

It is well established that a caveat is a proceeding in rem to attack the validity of a will. In re Will of Brock, 229 N.C. 482, 50 S.E.2d 555 (1948); see also Wiggins, North Carolina Wills (2d ed.), § 124. The right to contest a will by caveat is conferred by statute, is in derogation of the ancient common law right to dispose of property by will at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brissie v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Matter of Will of HesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. In Re Will of CharlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. In Re the Will of WinborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baars v. Campbell University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Robinson v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. In Re the Purported Last Will & Testament of BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. In Re the Purported Last Will & Testament of BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. In Re the Purported Last Will & Testament of BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API