Brissie v. Craig
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.
Inasmuch as a court has only the jurisdiction committed to it by law, an objection based on the want of jurisdiction over the subject matter of an action may be raised at any time during the progress of the action. McCune v. Manufacturing Co., 217 N.C. 351, 8 S.E. 2d 219. As a consequence, the defendants had the right to demur to the complaint in the Supreme Court on the ground that it affirmatively shows upon its face that the Superior Court had no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action. G.S., sections 1-127, 1-134; Raleigh v. Hatcher, 220 N.C. 613, 18 S.E. 2d 207.
In order for a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. . AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- In Re HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Kaplan v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- In Re Will of ChismanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- McCune v. Rhodes-Rhyne Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- In Re the Foreclosure of a Certain Deed of Trust From WattsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Hooper v. HueySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- In Re Estate of LowtherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- In Re Will of CharlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Farthing v. FarthingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.