Legal Opinion

In Re the Will of Winborne

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1950No. 20PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The caveators insist that the check deposited by them comes within the phrase “or otherwise secure such costs” as used in the statute. This contention is not tenable. The phrase is but a part of a clause which gives it an entirely different meaning — “When a caveator shall have given bond . . . or . . . deposited money or given a mortgage in lieu of sncb bond, or shall have filed affidavits and satisfied the cleric of his inability to give such bond or otherwise secure such costs . . .” The statute is clear. The caveator must give a bond or deposit cash or give a mortgage in lieu of bond. If…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McArthur v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. In Re Estate of MeredithMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Braeuel v. ReutherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  4. General American Life Insurance v. StadiemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Webb v. EgglestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Diemar & Kirk Company v. Smart Styles, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Narron v. Union Camp Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. In Re the Purported Last Will & Testament of BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Matter of Will of HesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API