Legal Opinion
Town of York v. Cragin
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 26, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Justice.
The defendants in these consolidated cases appeal from declaratory judgments rendered by the Superior Court (York County) in favor of the Town of York, plaintiff in both cases. The Superior Court declared that separate proposed real estate developments of defendants Fred H. Baldwin, Jr., Baldwin and L. John DiPalma, and Patrick Cragin, all in the Town of York were subdivisions within the meaning of 30 M.R.S.A. § 4956(1) (Supp.1987). We vacate the judgments as to all defendants.
This case involves three development proposals in the Town of York. Baldwin and DiPalma received…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Town of Arundel v. SwainSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Planning Bd. of Town of Naples v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- Casco Northern Bank, N.A. v. Green Corp. (In Re Green Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1993
- Bakala v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- In Re Appeal of LoweSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Ann Cannon v. Town of Mount DesertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
- Town of York v. CraginSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.