Legal Opinion
In Re Appeal of Lowe
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 1, 1995No. 94-421PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
The Town of Colchester appeals from the decision of the Chittenden Superior Court that Beverly and Debra Lowe (landowners) do not need a zoning or subdivision permit to convert rental camps on a lot near Lake Champlain to condominium ownership. The town argues that the permit is required by the town’s subdivision ordinance and that the ordinance is valid. We affirm.
The lot in question borders Lake Champlain and contains six single-family camps which have been rented in the past. The lot does not conform to current zoning requirements because it contains multiple structures, some of which are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Application of WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Nash v. Warren Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Maplewood Vil. Ten. Assn. v. Maplewood Vil.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Drumheller v. Shelburne Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Supervisor of Assessments v. Chase AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Appeals of Shantee Point, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- In Re Appeal of Taft Corners Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Appeal of GregoireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Golden Key, LLC v. HarperSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Appeal of GauthierVermont Superior Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.