Legal Opinion

Town of Arundel v. Swain

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 8, 1977PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DELAHANTY, Justice.

By its complaint, the Town of Arundel (the Town) sought to enjoin defendants, Morrill and Frances Swain (the Swains), from violation of a local subdivision ordinance. From judgment entered for defendants, the Town appeals. We deny the appeal.

Pursuant to 30 M.R.S.A. § 4956, 1 the Town enacted a subdivision ordinance on March 17,1972 which required local approval of subdivision developments. Although they believed that their proposed campground was not a subdivision and that, therefore, the Arundel Planning Board (the Board) had no jurisdiction over their endeavor, the Swains…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Finks v. Maine State Highway CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. In Re Spring Valley DevelopmentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  3. King Resources Co. v. Environmental Improvement CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  4. Moyer v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  5. Pratt v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Mundy Ex Rel. Pamela v. SimmonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Lakes Environmental Ass'n v. Town of NaplesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. Pedro/Aspen, Ltd. v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Brousseau v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. Pride's Corner Concerned Citizens Ass'n v. Westbrook Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API