Legal Opinion

City of Lincoln v. Nebraska Workmen's Compensation Court

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1937No. 30125PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

From the order of the district court for Lancaster county dismissing this action (which is in the nature of prohibition) for want of jurisdiction, and thereafter overruling its motion for a new trial, the city of Lincoln appeals.

The events out of which the litigation arises, include the following: On April 27, 1936, Ben Swadley filed his petition against the city of Lincoln, asserting claims under the Nebraska workmen’s compensation law. It was in usual form, and its sufficiency is not questioned. To the petition the city of Lincoln filed its answer on May 9, 1936. A trial upon the merits was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Baughn v. UreNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State ex rel. Board of Transportation v. Fremont, Elkhorn & Valley R. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  3. People ex rel. Keeney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. State ex rel. Thayer v. School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Clother v. MaherNebraska Supreme Court · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. DeyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Anstine v. State, Department of Banking & Receivership DivisionNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Johnson v. School District of WakefieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Shamp v. Landy Clark Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Buckingham v. Creighton UniversityNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API