Legal Opinion

Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Deyle

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1990No. 89-426PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam 1

Bituminous Casualty Corporation (Bituminous) appeals from an order of the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court, which, on rehearing, directed Bituminous to pay $56,412.05 in nursing expenses for Theodore C. Deyle. Deyle cross-appeals and contends that the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in failing to award him an additional sum for waiting time, an attorney fee, and interest.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

“ ‘Findings of fact made by the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court after rehearing have the same force and effect as a jury verdict in a civil case. [Citations omitted.] In testing the sufficiency of…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. State v. CoppleNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Mendoza v. Omaha Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. KipfNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Huffman v. HuffmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Young v. Govier & MiloneNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In re Claims Against Pierce ElevatorNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Anthony v. Pre-Fab Transit Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Wetovick v. County of NanceNebraska Supreme Court · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API