Legal Opinion

Anstine v. State, Department of Banking & Receivership Division

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1939No. 30684PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

Eifel Anstine, on February 28, 1936, filed her petition against the state of Nebraska, department of banking, in the compensation court, to recover benefits under the workmen’s compensation law, with praecipe attached, directed to the clerk of the compensation court to issue a summons for service upon the defendant as provided by law. Summons was issued and no return made thereon. The state of Nebraska, department of banking, by B. N. Saunders as superintendent, answered; the answer being signed by “F. C. Radke, C. G. Miles, Their Attorneys.” An amended petition was filed by plaintiff,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Faught v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. People ex rel. Keeney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. State ex rel. Davis v. MortensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. City of Lincoln v. Nebraska Workmen's Compensation CourtNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. County of HitchcockNebraska Supreme Court · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Concerned Citizens of Kimball County, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ControlNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Beatrice Manor, Inc. v. Department of HealthNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. JenningsNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Edwards v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2021

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API