Legal Opinion

Bromley v. Goff

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts «re stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The declaration in this case was in assumpsit, and alleged that in the fall of the year 1887 the parties entered into a written lease and contract, in which the defendant agreed to and with the.plaintiff to let and lease to him the restaurant premises in the second story of the northwest corner of Jefferson avenue and Randolph street, Detroit, for and during the time from the date of the lease to May 1, 1889, for the refitting and repairs to be made, and which were immediately made, by plaintiff on said premises, and *214certain lunches to be furnished by plaintiff, and he duly furnished the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blackwood v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Mitchell v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Pierson v. SpauldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Beecher v. PetteeMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Midland Operating Co. v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Corman Co. v. L. A. Young IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Reynolds v. ReederMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API