Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Scott

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1879PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Wayne. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Defendants in error sued Mitchell in assumpsit, before a justice of the peace, and declared •orally on all the common counts, and added what was intended to ‘be a special count. They also filed a bill of particulars, and Mitchell pleaded the general issue. Judgment passing in their favor, Mitchell appealed, and on trial in the circuit they again recovered. The ■case was disposed of on the pleadings made before the *109justice, and the only question now raised depends on; the soundness of an objection that certain evidence was.; not admissible under the declaration.

It appears from the record, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Dubois v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. Hoagland v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1828
  4. Butterfield v. SeligmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ehrlich v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  2. Johnston v. Star Bucket Pump Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  3. Sauer v. McClintic-Marshall Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Bush v. BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Boydstun v. Hackney Land Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API