Mitchell v. Scott
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
Defendants in error sued Mitchell in assumpsit, before a justice of the peace, and declared •orally on all the common counts, and added what was intended to ‘be a special count. They also filed a bill of particulars, and Mitchell pleaded the general issue. Judgment passing in their favor, Mitchell appealed, and on trial in the circuit they again recovered. The ■case was disposed of on the pleadings made before the *109justice, and the only question now raised depends on; the soundness of an objection that certain evidence was.; not admissible under the declaration.
It appears from the record, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Dubois v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1830
- Hoagland v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1828
- Butterfield v. SeligmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ehrlich v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- Johnston v. Star Bucket Pump Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Sauer v. McClintic-Marshall Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Bush v. BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Boydstun v. Hackney Land Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.