Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Reeder

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Kent. (Adsit, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Plaintiff brought an action for the breach of a contract of employment. The declaration alleged:

“ For that whereas, heretofore, to -wit, on the 10th day of October, A. D. 1892, at the city of Grand Rajiids, the said plaintiff, at the defendants’ request, entered into an agreement with the said defendants, whereby said plaintiff bargained to work for said defendants as a traveling salesman for the term of one year from the 10th day of October, 1892, and said defendants, in consideration of such services, agreed to pay said plaintiff for his said services the sum of $800 a year’s services, in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bromley v. GoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Campbell v. Davidson-Martin Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API