Legal Opinion

Corman Co. v. L. A. Young Industries

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1925No. Docket No. 6PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiff made a contract with defendant whereby plaintiff was made its agent to place its advertising matter for one year ■ and longer unless otherwise revoked. After plaintiff did the preliminary work the defendant canceled the contract. Nothing was paid to the publishers. As defendant had canceled its agreement it was unwilling to pay the demand,- and this suit was brought by plaintiff to recover for services rendered. The declaration contained two counts, one on the contract and another upon the common counts. The court submitted the case to the jury upon the quantum meruit, and reserved…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ware Bros. v. Cortland Cart & Carriage Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Hemminger v. Western Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Bush v. BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Mitchell v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Moore v. Capewell Horse Nail Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morris Pumps v. Centerline Piping, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Nyman v. B. S. Chapin, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Meyers v. CohenMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API