McLaughlin v. Okumura
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Upon learning that judgment debtors Lor-imer and Pamela MeLaughlin were about to receive settlement proceeds related to the malpractice of their former attorney Arthur Robson, judgment ereditor Masayoshi Oku-mura renewed his efforts to execute on his fraud judgment against them after nine years of inactivity. The superior court granted Okumura's motion for a new writ of execution, allowing him to execute on the McLaughlins' settlement proceeds. Attorney Michael MacDonald, who claimed to have assisted in obtaining those settlement proceeds, moved to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Creditors Adjustment Co. v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. Inman v. DeanAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Brotherton v. BrothertonAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Guttchen v. GabrielAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Magden v. Alaska USA Federal Credit UnionAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Leisnoi, Inc. v. Merdes & Merdes, P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Leisnoi, Inc. v. Merdes & Merdes, P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013