Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Cashel & Emly
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff John Doe appeals from the trial court order quashing service of summons and process on the Archdiocese of Cashel & Emly in Ireland. We hold that plaintiff has waived the issue by his failure to fairly and completely set forth, discuss, and analyze the relevant facts under the applicable substantial evidence standard of review. We alternatively hold that substantial evidence supported the trial court’s ruling that defendant had insufficient contacts with the State of California to support an exercise of either general or specific jurisdiction.
FACTS AND…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Schmidlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Karlsson v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Martin v. Detroit Lions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Mendoza v. City of West CovinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Pope v. BabickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Adler v. Superior Court CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- American Rag v. Haralambus CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Atkinson v. Dept. of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.