Legal Opinion
Housley v. City of Poway
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 2, 1993No. D016527PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FROEHLICH, J.
Appellants the City of Poway (City) and CF Pomerado (Developer) appeal from the judgment in favor of respondent John Housley (Housley). The jury awarded $40,000 against City as damages for inverse condemnation and $112,452 against Developer for fraud damages. The central issue on appeal is whether the damage instructions were correct.
I. Facts
Housley was the longtime owner of a one-acre parcel in Poway. He had built and occupied a residence on that parcel. The parcel, which abutted Pomerado Road, was in the path of the expansion of Pomerado Road, and the events surrounding…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- OCM Principal Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. CIBC World Markets Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Kelly v. CB&I CONSTRUCTORS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- CONTRA COSTA WATER DIST. v. Vaquero Farms, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Strebel v. Brenlar Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.