Legal Opinion

Carbone v. Overfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1983No. 82-1260PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.

The question presented in this case is whether the defense of sovereign immunity is available to a board of education in an action seeking damages for injuries allegedly caused by the negligence of the board’s employees. Appellant argues that the board of education is not protected under the doctrine of governmental immunity. We agree.

In Enghauser Mfg. Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd. (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 31, 32-33, this court held that “* * * immunity from tort liability heretofore judicially conferred upon local governmental units is hereby abrogated.” Enghauser is merely an extension of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Dickerhoof v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Strohofer v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Marrek v. Cleveland Metroparks Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Zents v. Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Beifuss v. Westerville Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State, Department of Transportation v. SullivanOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Longfellow v. City of NewarkOhio Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API