Legal Opinion

Longfellow v. City of Newark

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1985No. 83-1338PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue we face in the appeal sub judice is whether the city is subject to dismissal as a party on the basis of sovereign immunity. We hold that the city was erroneously dismissed as a party.

This court abolished the doctrine of sovereign immunity for municipal corporations in Haverlack v. Portage Homes, supra. As we stated in Haverlack, supra, at 30:

“A municipal corporation, unless immune by statute, is liable for its negligence in the performance or nonperformance of its acts.”

We subsequently extended and refined the abolition of sovereign immunity for municipal corporations in Enghauser…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Zents v. Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Mathis v. Cleveland Public LibraryOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Adams v. PeoplesOhio Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sawicki v. Village of Ottawa HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Molton v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. Stallworth v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Brodie v. Summit County Children Services BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Molton v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API