Legal Opinion

State, Department of Transportation v. Sullivan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1988No. 87-1209PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The sole issue presented for our review is whether the long-established rule, that a statute of limitations does not apply as a bar to the rights of the state unless expressly named in the statute, has become outdated and without effect. Appellant argues that such rule is no longer viable in light of this court’s long line of cases abrogating the common-law doctrine of sovereign immunity that had previously been afforded municipalities and other political subdivisions2 and the state’s limited waiver of sovereign immunity in R.C. Chapter 2743.3 Because we hold that the policy reasons…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. City of Shelbyville v. Shelbyville Restorium, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Schenkolewski v. Cleveland Metroparks SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ohio State Board of Pharmacy v. FrantzOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Portage County Board of Commissioners v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. McKinleyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Beavercreek Local Schools v. Basic, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Fennelly v. A-1 MacHine & Tool Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API