Legal Opinion

Landauer v. Huey

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 16, 1960No. 18641 and 18702PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Doyle.

Landauer and Smith were defendants in an action instituted by Huey and Christensen in the district court of Morgan County. They seek review of the judgment by writ of error in case No. 18,641 in this Court. Huey and Christensen also bring error to review of portions of the same judgment by writ of error in No. 18,702. The two writs of error have been consolidated and Huey and Christensen will be here referred to as plaintiffs and Landauer and Smith as defendants, as they appeared in the trial court.

Essentially, the action is one for breach of contract and involves…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. HurfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  2. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co. v. CallenderMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Eysenbach v. Cardinal Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. McCullough Tool Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Mercantile National Bank v. McCullough Tool Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. TW Phillips Gas and Oil Co. v. JedlickaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Fisher v. HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Wickland v. SnyderColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Francisco v. CASCADE INVESTMENT COMPANYColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Globe Drilling Co. v. CramerColorado Court of Appeals · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API