Legal Opinion

Mercantile National Bank v. McCullough Tool Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1953No. A-3833PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

This controversy determines which of two creditors shall bear a portion of the loss caused by the failure of an oil company. The determining question: May a third party action be brought upon a contract under which a bank agrees to lend money to an oil company to be disbursed to its creditors from a deposit account? The answer is “No” where (as here) the oil company has not authorized the bank to pay the specific account in a manner meeting the bank’s requirements for withdrawing money from the deposit account.

The Court of Civil Appeals, 250 S.W. 2d 870, allowed the tool company a recovery…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCown v. SchrimpfTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. McCullough Tool Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Texas Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. National Bankers Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Apex Siding & Roofing Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Farmers State Bank v. First State Bank of LibertyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Harwood & Associates, Inc. v. Texas Bank and Trust, First City Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API