Legal Opinion
Eysenbach v. Cardinal Petroleum Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 9, 1925No. 11474PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff commenced its action against the defendant in the district court of Tulsa county, for damages based upon the alleged breach of a contract in failing to drill two oil and gas wells.
The contract sued upon hears the date of January 24, 1919, and in substance provided; Plaintiff sold and assigned its complete interest in oil and gas leases covering about 500 acres of land situated in Pittsburg county. Okla., to Che defendant, upon the following conditions: (1) For the sum of $1,000 cash in hand paid, and the additional sum of $14,000 to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff upon the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- First Nat. Bank v. SwanWyoming Supreme Court · 1890
- Warner v. BenjaminWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Ardizonne v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Chamberlain v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Long v. WoodmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1870
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hoffer Oil Corporation v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- Brown v. Homestake Exploration Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
- Cosden Oil & Gas Co. v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Watchorn v. Roxana Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.