Legal Opinion

State v. Hantman Riedel

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 1, 2003No. 2 CA-SA 2003-0026Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 The State of Arizona petitions this court for special action relief in its attempt to reinstate a misdemeanor prosecution for driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI) and driving with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .10 or more against real party in interest Allan Clyde Riedel. A justice of the peace ordered the charges dismissed on statute of limitations grounds, an order that was subsequently affirmed by the respondent superior court judge on appeal. For the following reasons, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief.

¶2 Because this case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. United States v. Super. Ct. in & for Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Johnson v. Tucson City CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. Uhlig v. LindbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API