Legal Opinion

Uhlig v. Lindberg

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 22, 1997No. 2 CA-SA 97-0011PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Presiding Judge.

In this special action proceeding, Petitioner Diane Uhlig challenges the Respondent Judge’s order which reversed the Tucson City Court’s dismissal with prejudice, on limitations grounds, of the misdemeanor criminal charges against petitioner. Petitioner contends the Respondent Judge’s ruling was arbitrary and in excess of his jurisdiction and legal authority. Although the charges were filed within the one-year limitation period imposed by A.R.S. § 13-107(B)(2), she maintains that once the City Court dismissed the charges without prejudice on the State’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Tucson City CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  2. Lee v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Qwest Corp. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. Pima Cty. v. McCarville Ex Rel. Pinal Cty.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. PIMA COUNTY v. DOS PICOS LAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SHEPARD, Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. Qwest Corporation v. Mark McMahonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  5. State v. Hantman RiedelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API