Legal Opinion

Dakota Tribal Industries v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 3, 1995No. 95-235 CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MILLER, Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss claims of misrepresentation from a complaint1 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1) because they fail to allege a sufficient connection with specific contract obligations. Argument is deemed unnecessary.

FACTS

The following facts came from plaintiff’s complaint. Dakota Tribal Industries (“plaintiff’) undertook to respond to a bid solicita*297tion by the Defense Personnel Support Center (the “Support Center”), an agency of the Defense Logistics Agency, for GP Medium Tents needed during the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Somali Development Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pratt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  2. D.F.K. Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  3. Colon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  4. Solaria Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Janowsky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API