Legal Opinion

D.F.K. Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 22, 1999No. 96-423CPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This dispute arises out of a contract between plaintiff, D.F.K. Construction Corporation (“DFK”), and the Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”), for the painting of water storage tanks located at the White Sands Missile Range (“WSMR”) in White Sands, New Mexico. In its complaint, DFK alleges that the Corps breached the contract by misrepresenting the amount of adverse weather experienced at the site, which in turn resulted in unanticipated work stoppages and corresponding increases in the overhead costs incurred by DFK over the course of contract performance. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  2. Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Hi-Shear Technology Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Troutman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Stamps v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API