Legal Opinion
Pluntz v. Farmington Ford-Mercury, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 28, 1991No. CX-91-96PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
On December 22,1989, a number of trees on respondent James Pluntz’ property were damaged when a car driven by Bruce Leander left the roadway abutting respondent’s property. The car was owned by Leander's employer, appellant Farmington Ford Mercury Inc. (Farmington). Leander lost control of the car after suffering a sudden cardiac and respiratory arrest. Pluntz commenced a trespass action against Farm-ington to recover property damages. The trial court granted summary judgment for Pluntz. Based on the parties’ stipulation as to the amount of damages, judgment was entered…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Lange v. National Biscuit CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wyatt v. SweitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012