Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentWiggins, J.
¶39 (dissenting) — I agree with the majority that the Jongewards (hereinafter referred to collectively as Jongeward) may be unable to recover treble damages. But our legislature enacted this timber trespass statute with more than treble damages in mind. Our timber trespass statute also creates a single damages remedy for plaintiffs whose trees have been damaged by apparently “casual or involuntary” trespass. Jongeward may be entitled to damages on these facts, so this case should be allowed to proceed. Instead of recognizing this potential remedy, the majority takes our timber trespass…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- Simpson Inv. Co. v. State, Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Silverstreak, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. OF LABORWashington Supreme Court · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.