Legal Opinion

Watson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1917No. 4622PublishedCited by 36 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Judge.

Appellants were jointly indicted, tried and convicted of forgery. The instrument which they were charged with forging was a note for $151.25, dated Teague, Texas, August 20, 1916, payable to the Farmers and Merchants State Bank or order at Teague, Texas, signed “G. F. Stilwell.” The note was on one of the printed forms of the Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Teague. C. S. Stilwell testified that he had been a customer of the bank but had ceased to do business with it about ninety days before it was taken over by the State department. He further said that he did not sign the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Johnson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Shaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Cade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Cavanar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API