Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Williams v. Morris

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 22, 1980No. 80-1296PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

Petitioners, who pleaded guilty in their state court criminal prosecutions, sought writs of habeas corpus claiming that state judges violated petitioners’ Fourteenth Amendment rights by failing to inform them that a mandatory three-year parole term would automatically attach to the sentences they were promised under plea agreements. The petitions were consolidat*73ed below, and District Judge Prentice Marshall, finding United States ex rel. Baker v. Finkbeiner, 551 F.2d 180 (7th Cir. 1977), controlling, held that petitioners were entitled to relief. 447 F.Supp. 95…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. WhitfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. United States v. Gregory James WalshCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  3. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. People v. FishAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Dudley James Russo v. Attorney General of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API