Legal Opinion

People v. Whitfield

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2005No. 98136PublishedCited by 252 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

Defendant, Ronald Whitfield, appeals the dismissal of his postconviction petition. He contends that his constitutional rights were substantially violated because he entered a plea of guilty in exchange for a specific sentence, but, with the addition of a statutorily required term of mandatory supervised release (MSR), about which the trial court never admonished him, he was given a more onerous sentence and, as a result, denied the benefit of his negotiated plea bargain. As a remedy, he asks that his sentence of imprisonment be decreased by the length of the statutorily required MSR term.

For…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by252 opinions

  1. People v. PendletonIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. BeamanIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. HughesIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  5. People v. MedinaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006

247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API